Are the Feds serious about ELLs?

I once had the opportunity to meet Rosalinda B. Barrerra, the Director of Title III programs at the federal level.  She had amazing energy and passion for the work of improving educational outcomes for ELLs.  I asked her, "Why did you decide to work for the Department of Education?  Isn't the bureaucracy stifling?"  She said, "Well, I was a bilingual leader in my district and I thought I could make a bigger difference at the state level so I became a state-level director, then I thought I could make a bigger difference in Washington so I came here."  She was determined to make a difference and that's why it's sad that she left suddenly and without an explanation from the Feds.  Perhaps it was related to the fact that Title III funding has been lumped in with Title I since 2008, which effectively made Title III more beholden to Title I and less able to advocate effectively for resources for ELLs.  Or - perhaps it had something to do with the fact that the National Clearinghouse for English Language Education (NCELA), a source of research-based information for many professionals, has been outsourced to a company that has only existed for one year.  The long-term contract for operating NCELA had been held by George Washington University but the Feds opened the contract for bidding and awarded it to a fledging company with little language experience.  Thankfully, due to complaints they are reviewing the decision and may open up bidding again.  However, all of this makes me wonder if there is a true commitment to improving educational outcomes for ELLs or if the Feds are looking for short-cuts and opportunities to use the "business model" to address ELL language needs quickly and cheaply.  Click here to read the Edweek article with more information.